Research shows what sells food to kids: cartoons, celebrities, commercials on their favorite television programs, and toys in Happy Meals. This kind of marketing induces kids to want the products, pester their parents for them, and throw tantrums if parents say no. Marketing makes kids think they are supposed to eat advertised foods, and so undermines parental authority.<\/p>\n
Public health officials look for ways to intervene, given their particular legislated mandates and authority. But much as they might like to, they can\u2019t do much about marketing to children. Food and beverage companies invoke the First Amendment to protect their \u201cright\u201d to market junk foods to kids. They lobby Congress on this issue so effectively that they even managed to block the Federal Trade Commission\u2018s proposed nonbinding, voluntary nutrition standards for marketing food to kids.<\/p>\n
Canadian researchers report that kids are three times more likely to choose healthier meals if those meals come with a toy and the regular ones do not. When it comes to kids\u2019 food choices, the meal with the toy is invariably the default.<\/p>\n
A recent study in Pediatrics compared obesity rates in kids living in states with and without restrictions on the kinds of foods sold in schools. Guess what \u2013 the kids living in states where schools don\u2019t sell junk food are not as overweight.<\/p>\n
Circulation has just published an American Heart Association review of \u201cevidence-based population approaches\u201d to improving diets. It concludes that evidence supports the value of intense media campaigns, on-site educational programs in stores, subsidies for fruits and vegetables, taxes, school gardens, worksite wellness programs and restrictions on marketing to children.<\/p>\n","auteur":null},"elements_rattaches":false},"yoast_head":"\n